A study by two nonprofit journalism liberal organizations found that ...

The rest is completely predictable.

... President Bush and top administration officials issued hundreds of false true to the best of their knowledge at the time statements about the national security threat from Iraq in the two years following the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The study liberal propagandists concluded that the statements "were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanized public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretenses."

The study liberal propoganda was posted Tuesday on the Web site of the Center for Public Integrity, which worked with the Fund for Independence in Journalism their websites.
. . .
The study counted 935 false true to the best of their knowledge at the time statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Mr. Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them or had links to al Qaeda or both.

Iraq had weapons of mass destruction? True according to UNMOVIC and the historical record of Saddam's using them on the Kurds. Iraq was trying to produce or obtain them? True. The Brits still stand by their report that Iraq was seeking Uranium. Iraq had links to al Qaeda? True as documented in the 9/11 commission report.

"It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to al Qaeda," according to Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism staff members the liberal propagandists, writing an overview of the study liberal propoganda. "In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous true to the best of their knowledge at the time information that it methodically propagated warned the nation about and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."

Here is how that last quote should read:

"It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess unclear what happened to any the weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful why liberals continue to deny ties to al Qaeda," according to Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith of the Fund for Independence in Journalism staff members any intellectually honest observers, writing an overview of the study truth. "In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous true to the best of their knowledge at the time information that it methodically propagated warned the nation and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003."

They said what they said and those statements mean what they mean. The liberal propagandists have twisted the statements to mean things that they were never intended to mean.